↓ Skip to main content

Validity and Reliability of the Paprosky Acetabular Defect Classification

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Validity and Reliability of the Paprosky Acetabular Defect Classification
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2844-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond Yu, Jochen G. Hofstaetter, Thomas Sullivan, Kerry Costi, Donald W. Howie, Lucian B. Solomon

Abstract

The Paprosky acetabular defect classification is widely used but has not been appropriately validated. Reliability of the Paprosky system has not been evaluated in combination with standardized techniques of measurement and scoring.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 52%
Engineering 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,736
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,382
of 309,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#167
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.