You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Direct and indirect effects of land use on floral resources and flower‐visiting insects across an urban landscape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oikos, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20229.x |
| Authors |
K. C. Matteson, J. B. Grace, E. S. Minor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 307 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 60 | 18% |
| Researcher | 52 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 15% |
| Unknown | 49 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 164 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 81 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 59 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2013.
All research outputs
#19,402,050
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Oikos
#2,858
of 3,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,894
of 175,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oikos
#22
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.