You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sensitivity and specificity of FTDC criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1212/wnl.0b013e318292a342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer M. Harris, Claire Gall, Jennifer C. Thompson, Anna M.T. Richardson, David Neary, Daniel du Plessis, Piyali Pal, David M.A. Mann, Julie S. Snowden, Matthew Jones |
| Abstract |
We aimed to assess sensitivity and specificity of the updated criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) based on a large autopsy-confirmed cohort of patients with dementia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 27% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 17% |
| Psychology | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,497,306
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#9,389
of 21,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,743
of 209,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#98
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.