↓ Skip to main content

Comparative efficacy of alpha-linolenic acid and gamma-linolenic acid to attenuate valproic acid-induced autism-like features

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Comparative efficacy of alpha-linolenic acid and gamma-linolenic acid to attenuate valproic acid-induced autism-like features
Published in
Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13105-016-0532-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sneha Yadav, Virendra Tiwari, Manjari Singh, Rajnish K. Yadav, Subhadeep Roy, Uma Devi, Swetlana Gautam, Jitendra Kumar Rawat, Mohd. Nazam Ansari, Abdulaziz Sa Saeedan, Anand Prakash, Shubhini A. Saraf, Gaurav Kaithwas

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to elucidate the effect of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA, 18:3, ω-3) and gamma-linolenic acid (GLA, 18:3, ω-6) on experimental autism features induced by early prenatal exposure to valproic acid (VPA) in albino wistar pups. The pups were scrutinized on the accounts of behavioral, biochemical, and inflammatory markers, and the results suggested that the GLA can impart significant protection in comparison to ALA against VPA-induced autism features. When scrutinized histopathologically, the cerebellum of the GLA-treated animals was evident for more marked protection toward neuronal degeneration and neuronal loss in comparison to ALA. Concomitant administration of ALA and GLA with VPA demonstrated a marked cutdown in the Pgp 9.5 expression with GLA having more pronounced effect. Henceforth, it can be concluded that ALA and GLA can impart favorable protection against the VPA-induced autism-like features with GLA having pronounced effect.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Neuroscience 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 22 34%