You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Support for healthcare workers and patients after medical error through mutual healing: another step towards patient safety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open Quality, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diane Louise Aubin, Allison Soprovich, Fabiola Diaz Carvallo, Deborah Prowse, Dean Eurich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 24% |
| Guernsey | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,796,202
of 24,046,191 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Quality
#80
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,825
of 450,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Quality
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,046,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.