↓ Skip to main content

Type specimens of Crotalus scutulatus (Chordata: Reptilia: Squamata: Viperidae) re-examined, with new evidence after more than a century of confusion

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Type specimens of Crotalus scutulatus (Chordata: Reptilia: Squamata: Viperidae) re-examined, with new evidence after more than a century of confusion
Published in
Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, March 2013
DOI 10.2988/0006-324x-126.1.11
Authors

Michael D. Cardwell, Steve W. Gotte, Roy W. McDiarmid, Ned Gilmore, James A. Poindexter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Professor 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 60%
Unspecified 1 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,686,611
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington
#165
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,280
of 194,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.