↓ Skip to main content

Self-efficacy beliefs and tennis performance

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Therapy and Research, June 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Self-efficacy beliefs and tennis performance
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research, June 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf01205140
Authors

Julian Barling, Mike Abel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 14 26%
Psychology 11 21%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#416
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,376
of 8,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them