↓ Skip to main content

The Natural History of Inflammatory Pseudotumors in Asymptomatic Patients After Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
The Natural History of Inflammatory Pseudotumors in Asymptomatic Patients After Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2944-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sulaiman A. Almousa, Nelson V. Greidanus, Bassam A. Masri, Clive P. Duncan, Donald S. Garbuz

Abstract

Although pseudotumors have been reported in 32% of asymptomatic metal-on-metal hips, the natural history of asymptomatic pseudotumors is unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 53%
Engineering 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Materials Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2013.
All research outputs
#14,913,296
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,600
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,034
of 210,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#60
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.