Title |
Differences Between Seven Measures of Self-Reported Numbers of Clients of Female Sex Workers in Southern India: Implications for Individual- and Population-Level Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
AIDS and Behavior, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10461-012-0279-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kathleen N. Deering, P. Vickerman, M. Pickles, S. Moses, J. F. Blanchard, B. M. Ramesh, S. Isac, M.-C. Boily |
Abstract |
Quantifying sexual activity of sub-populations with high-risk sexual behaviour is important in understanding HIV epidemiology. This study examined inconsistency of seven outcomes measuring self-reported clients per month (CPM) of female sex workers (FSWs) in southern India and implications for individual/population-level analysis. Multivariate negative binomial regression was used to compare key social/environmental factors associated with each outcome. A transmission dynamics model was used to assess the impact of differences between outcomes on population-level FSW/client HIV prevalence. Outcomes based on 'clients per last working day' produced lower estimates than those based on 'clients per typical day'. Although the outcomes were strongly correlated, their averages differed by approximately two-fold (range 39.0-79.1 CPM). The CPM measure chosen did not greatly influence standard epidemiological 'risk factor' analysis. Differences across outcomes influenced HIV prevalence predictions. Due to this uncertainty, we recommend basing population-based estimates on the range of outcomes, particularly when assessing the impact of interventions. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
Researcher | 5 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 15% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 27% |