You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary Intake and Eating Behaviours of Obese New Zealand Children and Adolescents Enrolled in a Community-Based Intervention Programme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0166996 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yvonne C. Anderson, Lisa E. Wynter, Michelle S. Butler, Cameron C. Grant, Joanna M. Stewart, Tami L. Cave, Cervantée E. K. Wild, José G. B. Derraik, Wayne S. Cutfield, Paul L. Hofman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 166 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 51 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,928,984
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#23,467
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,775
of 420,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#412
of 3,989 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,989 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.