↓ Skip to main content

An Update on Antidepressant Use in Bipolar Depression

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
An Update on Antidepressant Use in Bipolar Depression
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11920-012-0323-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle M. Sidor, Glenda M. MacQueen

Abstract

The effective treatment of depression in people with bipolar disorder remains a clinical challenge. The role of antidepressant medication in treating bipolar depression has been controversial. While early studies and meta-analyses supported a role for antidepressant medication, more recent, high quality randomized controlled trials in bipolar depression have generally not demonstrated efficacy for antidepressant medications. Although the risk of affective switch and long-term de-stabilization remains a concern when using antidepressant medications in bipolar disorder, the magnitude of this risk has been difficult to ascertain with confidence. Maintenance use of antidepressant medication has generally not demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit ratio. Future studies should explore the patient characteristics and response patterns that predict a more favorable response profile to antidepressants amongst patients with bipolar disorder so that the medications can be rationally used in those who are most likely to benefit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 25 26%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 38%
Psychology 11 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2014.
All research outputs
#17,686,611
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#993
of 1,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,494
of 174,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.