↓ Skip to main content

Stress changes from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and increased hazard in the Sichuan basin

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
378 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stress changes from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and increased hazard in the Sichuan basin
Published in
Nature, July 2008
DOI 10.1038/nature07177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Parsons, Chen Ji, Eric Kirby

Abstract

On 12 May 2008, the devastating magnitude 7.9 (Wenchuan) earthquake struck the eastern edge of the Tibetan plateau, collapsing buildings and killing thousands in major cities aligned along the western Sichuan basin in China. After such a large-magnitude earthquake, rearrangement of stresses in the crust commonly leads to subsequent damaging earthquakes. The mainshock of the 12 May earthquake ruptured with as much as 9 m of slip along the boundary between the Longmen Shan and Sichuan basin, and demonstrated the complex strike-slip and thrust motion that characterizes the region. The Sichuan basin and surroundings are also crossed by other active strike-slip and thrust faults. Here we present calculations of the coseismic stress changes that resulted from the 12 May event using models of those faults, and show that many indicate significant stress increases. Rapid mapping of such stress changes can help to locate fault sections with relatively higher odds of producing large aftershocks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
China 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 177 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 23%
Researcher 26 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 25 13%
Student > Master 15 8%
Professor 10 5%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 109 57%
Engineering 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 45 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,484,750
of 25,037,495 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#37,892
of 96,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,488
of 92,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#89
of 565 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,037,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 565 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.