You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Childhood Trauma and Psychosis in a Prospective Cohort Study: Cause, Effect, and Directionality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Psychiatry, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12091169 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian Kelleher, Helen Keeley, Paul Corcoran, Hugh Ramsay, Camilla Wasserman, Vladimir Carli, Marco Sarchiapone, Christina Hoven, Danuta Wasserman, Mary Cannon |
| Abstract |
Using longitudinal and prospective measures, the authors assessed the relationship between childhood trauma and psychotic experiences, addressing the following questions: 1) Does exposure to trauma predict incident psychotic experiences? 2) Does cessation of trauma predict cessation of psychotic experiences? 3) What is the direction of the relationship between childhood trauma and psychotic experiences? |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 17% |
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 29% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 394 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Researcher | 38 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 82 | 20% |
| Unknown | 101 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 146 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 7% |
| Unknown | 121 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#490,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Psychiatry
#419
of 7,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,476
of 210,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Psychiatry
#4
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.