↓ Skip to main content

Biofuels from algae: challenges and potential

Overview of attention for article published in Biofuels, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 157)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
14 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
645 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1317 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biofuels from algae: challenges and potential
Published in
Biofuels, April 2014
DOI 10.4155/bfs.10.44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Hannon, Javier Gimpel, Miller Tran, Beth Rasala, Stephen Mayfield

Abstract

Algae biofuels may provide a viable alternative to fossil fuels; however, this technology must overcome a number of hurdles before it can compete in the fuel market and be broadly deployed. These challenges include strain identification and improvement, both in terms of oil productivity and crop protection, nutrient and resource allocation and use, and the production of co-products to improve the economics of the entire system. Although there is much excitement about the potential of algae biofuels, much work is still required in the field. In this article, we attempt to elucidate the major challenges to economic algal biofuels at scale, and improve the focus of the scientific community to address these challenges and move algal biofuels from promise to reality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1289 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 268 20%
Student > Master 217 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 212 16%
Researcher 117 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 4%
Other 166 13%
Unknown 288 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 323 25%
Engineering 169 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 144 11%
Environmental Science 93 7%
Chemical Engineering 76 6%
Other 165 13%
Unknown 347 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#918,359
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biofuels
#4
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,846
of 241,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biofuels
#2
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.