You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relative sea-level rise around East Antarctica during Oligocene glaciation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ngeo1783 |
| Authors |
Paolo Stocchi, Carlota Escutia, Alexander J. P. Houben, Bert L. A. Vermeersen, Peter K. Bijl, Henk Brinkhuis, Robert M. DeConto, Simone Galeotti, Sandra Passchier, David Pollard, Henk Brinkhuis, Carlota Escutia, Adam Klaus, Annick Fehr, Trevor Williams, James A. P. Bendle, Peter K. Bijl, Steven M. Bohaty, Stephanie A. Carr, Robert B. Dunbar, Jose Abel Flores, Jhon J. Gonzàlez, Travis G. Hayden, Masao Iwai, Francisco J. Jimenez-Espejo, Kota Katsuki, Gee Soo Kong, Robert M. McKay, Mutsumi Nakai, Matthew P. Olney, Sandra Passchier, Stephen F. Pekar, Jörg Pross, Christina Riesselman, Ursula Röhl, Toyosaburo Sakai, Prakash Kumar Shrivastava, Catherine E. Stickley, Saiko Sugisaki, Lisa Tauxe, Shouting Tuo, Tina van de Flierdt, Kevin Welsh, Masako Yamane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 22% |
| Professor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 80 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2013.
All research outputs
#2,048,423
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#1,971
of 3,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,382
of 210,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#50
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 106.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.