| Title |
Zoospore-derived monoecious gametophytes in Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ADS, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00343-014-3139-x |
| Authors |
Jing Li, Shaojun Pang, Tifeng Shan, Feng Liu, Suqin Gao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 28% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#2,956
of 25,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,908
of 319,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#73
of 523 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 523 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.