You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of intravenous morphine use and outcomes in acute coronary syndromes: Results from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Heart Journal, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trip J. Meine, Matthew T. Roe, Anita Y. Chen, Manesh R. Patel, Jeffrey B. Washam, E. Magnus Ohman, W. Frank Peacock, Charles V. Pollack, W. Brian Gibler, Eric D. Peterson, for the CRUSADE Investigators |
| Abstract |
Although intravenous morphine is commonly used for the treatment of chest pain in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS), its safety has not been evaluated. The CRUSADE Initiative is a nonrandomized, retrospective, observational registry enrolling patients with NSTE ACS to evaluate acute medications and interventions, inhospital outcomes, and discharge treatments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 20% |
| Scientists | 7 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 276 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 14% |
| Other | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 67 | 23% |
| Unknown | 63 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 156 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 75 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#424,391
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from American Heart Journal
#51
of 5,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#459
of 68,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Heart Journal
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.