↓ Skip to main content

The logic of empirical theories revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
The logic of empirical theories revisited
Published in
Synthese, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11229-011-9916-6
Authors

Johan van Benthem

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 3%
Poland 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 28 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 19%
Philosophy 5 16%
Computer Science 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 9%
Linguistics 3 9%
Other 9 28%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,828,338
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,835
of 2,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,537
of 108,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.