You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of probiotics in the management of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060753 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nengwen Huang, Jinjin Li, Xianghe Qiao, Yongzhi Wu, Yunkun Liu, Chenzhou Wu, Longjiang Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 11% |
| Mexico | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 946. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,909
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#37
of 25,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#510
of 482,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#1
of 746 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 746 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.