↓ Skip to main content

Developing Entrustable Professional Activities as the Basis for Assessment of Competence in an Internal Medicine Residency: A Feasibility Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Developing Entrustable Professional Activities as the Basis for Assessment of Competence in an Internal Medicine Residency: A Feasibility Study
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11606-013-2372-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen E. Hauer, Krishan Soni, Patricia Cornett, Jeff Kohlwes, Harry Hollander, Sumant R. Ranji, Olle ten Cate, Eric Widera, Brook Calton, Patricia S. O’Sullivan

Abstract

Graduate medical education programs assess trainees' performance to determine readiness for unsupervised practice. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are a novel approach for assessing performance of core professional tasks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 155 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Master 15 9%
Professor 11 7%
Other 48 30%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 53%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 38 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2013.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6,057
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,695
of 200,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#62
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.