Title |
Developing Entrustable Professional Activities as the Basis for Assessment of Competence in an Internal Medicine Residency: A Feasibility Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2372-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karen E. Hauer, Krishan Soni, Patricia Cornett, Jeff Kohlwes, Harry Hollander, Sumant R. Ranji, Olle ten Cate, Eric Widera, Brook Calton, Patricia S. O’Sullivan |
Abstract |
Graduate medical education programs assess trainees' performance to determine readiness for unsupervised practice. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are a novel approach for assessing performance of core professional tasks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 155 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
Professor | 11 | 7% |
Other | 48 | 30% |
Unknown | 26 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 53% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 4% |
Unknown | 38 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2013.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6,057
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,695
of 200,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#62
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.