↓ Skip to main content

Responses of a top and a meso predator and their prey to moon phases

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Responses of a top and a meso predator and their prey to moon phases
Published in
Oecologia, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2651-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincenzo Penteriani, Anna Kuparinen, Maria del Mar Delgado, Francisco Palomares, José Vicente López-Bao, José María Fedriani, Javier Calzada, Sacramento Moreno, Rafael Villafuerte, Letizia Campioni, Rui Lourenço

Abstract

We compared movement patterns and rhythms of activity of a top predator, the Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus, a mesopredator, the red fox Vulpes vulpes, and their shared principal prey, the rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, in relation to moon phases. Because the three species are mostly nocturnal and crepuscular, we hypothesized that the shared prey would reduce its activity at most risky moon phases (i.e. during the brightest nights), but that fox, an intraguild prey of lynx, would avoid lynx activity peaks at the same time. Rabbits generally moved further from their core areas on darkest nights (i.e. new moon), using direct movements which minimize predation risk. Though rabbits responded to the increased predation risk by reducing their activity during the full moon, this response may require several days, and the moon effect we observed on the rabbits had, therefore, a temporal gap. Lynx activity patterns may be at least partially mirroring rabbit activity: around new moons, when rabbits moved furthest and were more active, lynxes reduced their travelling distances and their movements were concentrated in the core areas of their home ranges, which generally correspond to areas of high density of rabbits. Red foxes were more active during the darkest nights, when both the conditions for rabbit hunting were the best and lynxes moved less. On the one hand, foxes increased their activity when rabbits were further from their core areas and moved with more discrete displacements; on the other hand, fox activity in relation to the moon seemed to reduce dangerous encounters with its intraguild predator.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 184 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 50%
Environmental Science 39 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Engineering 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 39 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#12,682,373
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,788
of 4,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,004
of 198,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#19
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.