| Title |
Design rules for nanomedical engineering: from physical virology to the applications of virus-based materials in medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biological Physics, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10867-013-9314-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy M. Wen, Pooja H. Rambhia, Roger H. French, Nicole F. Steinmetz |
| Abstract |
Physical virology seeks to define the principles of physics underlying viral infections, traditionally focusing on the fundamental processes governing virus assembly, maturation, and disassembly. A detailed understanding of virus structure and assembly has facilitated the development and analysis of virus-based materials for medical applications. In this Physical Virology review article, we discuss the recent developments in nanomedicine that help us to understand how physical properties affect the in vivo fate and clinical impact of (virus-based) nanoparticles. We summarize and discuss the design rules that need to be considered for the successful development and translation of virus-based nanomaterials from bench to bedside. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 80% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 30% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 14 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 13% |
| Engineering | 9 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,495,222
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Physics
#28
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,436
of 197,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Physics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.