↓ Skip to main content

A review of recent evidence relating to sugars, insulin resistance and diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
44 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
7 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
431 Mendeley
Title
A review of recent evidence relating to sugars, insulin resistance and diabetes
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00394-016-1340-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. A. Macdonald

Abstract

The potential impact on health of diets rich in free sugars, and particularly fructose, is of major concern. The focus of this review is the impact of these sugars on insulin resistance and obesity, and the associated risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Much of the concern is focussed on specific metabolic effects of fructose, which are argued to lead to increased fat deposition in the liver and skeletal muscle with subsequent insulin resistance and increased risk of diabetes. However, much of the evidence underpinning these arguments is based on animal studies involving very large intakes of the free sugars. Recent human studies, in the past 5 years, provide a rather different picture, with a clear dose response link between fructose intake and metabolic changes. In particular, the most marked effects are observed when a high sugars intake is accompanied by an excess energy intake. This does not mean that a high intake of free sugars does not have any detrimental impact on health, but rather that such an effect seems more likely to be a result of the high sugars intake increasing the chances of an excessive energy intake rather than it leading to a direct detrimental effect on metabolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 430 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 86 20%
Student > Master 73 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 10%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Researcher 25 6%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 130 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 68 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 7%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 153 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#365,738
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#115
of 2,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,313
of 417,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.