↓ Skip to main content

Natural killer cells regulate diverse T cell responses

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Immunology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural killer cells regulate diverse T cell responses
Published in
Trends in Immunology, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.it.2013.03.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Q. Crome, Philipp A. Lang, Karl S. Lang, Pamela S. Ohashi

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells are important mediators of the immune response against microbial pathogens and tumors. There is growing evidence from mouse and human studies that, NK cells exhibit immunoregulatory functions and can limit T cell immunity. NK cell regulatory activity has been demonstrated in a variety of disease models including chronic viral infection, autoimmunity, and transplantation. Depending on the nature of the immune challenge, NK cells use different strategies to limit T cell function, including via cytokines, interactions with NK receptors NKG2D and NKp46, or by perforin-mediated T cell death. Future work should address whether specific subsets of NK cells inhibit T cell responses, and how NK cells acquire immunosuppressive functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 4 2%
South Africa 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 224 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 26%
Researcher 48 20%
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 21 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 32%
Immunology and Microbiology 62 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 8%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 28 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,778,071
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Immunology
#1,428
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,955
of 209,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Immunology
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.