↓ Skip to main content

Can the world afford to ignore biotechnology solutions that address food insecurity?

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 2,842)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Can the world afford to ignore biotechnology solutions that address food insecurity?
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11103-013-0027-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judit Berman, Changfu Zhu, Eduard Pérez-Massot, Gemma Arjó, Uxue Zorrilla-López, Gemma Masip, Raviraj Banakar, Georgina Sanahuja, Gemma Farré, Bruna Miralpeix, Chao Bai, Evangelia Vamvaka, Maite Sabalza, Richard M. Twyman, Ludovic Bassié, Teresa Capell, Paul Christou

Abstract

Genetically engineered (GE) crops can be used as part of a combined strategy to address food insecurity, which is defined as a lack of sustainable access to safe and nutritious food. In this article, we discuss the causes and consequences of food insecurity in the developing world, and the indirect economic impact on industrialized countries. We dissect the healthcare costs and lost productivity caused by food insecurity, and evaluate the relative merits of different intervention programs including supplementation, fortification and the deployment of GE crops with higher yields and enhanced nutritional properties. We provide clear evidence for the numerous potential benefits of GE crops, particularly for small-scale and subsistence farmers. GE crops with enhanced yields and nutritional properties constitute a vital component of any comprehensive strategy to tackle poverty, hunger and malnutrition in developing countries and thus reduce the global negative economic effects of food insecurity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 154 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 34%
Student > Bachelor 28 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 39%
Environmental Science 22 13%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Engineering 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 29 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,781,638
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#22
of 2,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,083
of 192,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.