↓ Skip to main content

Yellow Biotechnology I

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 194: Utility of Insects for Studying Human Pathogens and Evaluating New Antimicrobial Agents.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Utility of Insects for Studying Human Pathogens and Evaluating New Antimicrobial Agents.
Chapter number 194
Book title
Yellow Biotechnology I
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/10_2013_194
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-239862-9, 978-3-64-239863-6
Authors

Wang Y, Li DD, Jiang YY, Mylonakis E, Yan Wang, De-Dong Li, Yuan-Ying Jiang, Eleftherios Mylonakis, Wang, Yan, Li, De-Dong, Jiang, Yuan-Ying, Mylonakis, Eleftherios

Abstract

Insect models, such as Galleria mellonella and Drosophila melanogaster have significant ethical, logistical, and economic advantages over mammalian models for the studies of infectious diseases. Using these models, various pathogenic microbes have been studied and many novel virulence genes have been identified. Notably, because insects are susceptible to a wide variety of human pathogens and have immune responses similar to those of mammals, they offer the opportunity to understand innate immune responses against human pathogens better. It is important to note that insect pathosystems have also offered a simple strategy to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of many antimicrobial agents. Overall, insect models provide a rapid, inexpensive, and reliable way as complementary hosts to conventional vertebrate animal models to study pathogenesis and antimicrobial agents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 13%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Linguistics 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2016.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#147
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,199
of 199,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.