| Title |
A Practical Guide To Developing Effective Web‐based Learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30029.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A Cook, Denise M Dupras |
| Abstract |
Online learning has changed medical education, but many "educational" websites do not employ principles of effective learning. This article will assist readers in developing effective educational websites by integrating principles of active learning with the unique features of the Web. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Turkey | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 444 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 81 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 12% |
| Researcher | 40 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 40 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 121 | 25% |
| Unknown | 108 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 140 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 75 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 36 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 19 | 4% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 78 | 16% |
| Unknown | 117 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,324
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,472
of 62,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#31
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.