↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of ribosomal protein expression specify normal and malignant human cells

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
twitter
41 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
Title
Patterns of ribosomal protein expression specify normal and malignant human cells
Published in
Genome Biology, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-1104-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joao C. Guimaraes, Mihaela Zavolan

Abstract

Ribosomes are highly conserved molecular machines whose core composition has traditionally been regarded as invariant. However, recent studies have reported intriguing differences in the expression of some ribosomal proteins (RPs) across tissues and highly specific effects on the translation of individual mRNAs. To determine whether RPs are more generally linked to cell identity, we analyze the heterogeneity of RP expression in a large set of human tissues, primary cells, and tumors. We find that about a quarter of human RPs exhibit tissue-specific expression and that primary hematopoietic cells display the most complex patterns of RP expression, likely shaped by context-restricted transcriptional regulators. Strikingly, we uncover patterns of dysregulated expression of individual RPs across cancer types that arise through copy number variations and are predictive for disease progression. Our study reveals an unanticipated plasticity of RP expression across normal and malignant human cell types and provides a foundation for future characterization of cellular behaviors that are orchestrated by specific RPs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 251 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 24%
Student > Master 33 13%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 60 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 94 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 67 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#341,300
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#148
of 4,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,812
of 417,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#6
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.