↓ Skip to main content

Immunochromatographic determination of bacopaside I in biological samples

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunochromatographic determination of bacopaside I in biological samples
Published in
Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.11.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sontaya Sookying, Dumrongsak Pekthong, Sarawut Oo-puthinan, Watoo Phrompittayarat, Waraporn Putalun, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Jie Xing, Zhaoqi Zhan, Nantaka Khorana, Nitra Nuengchamnong, Kornkanok Ingkaninan

Abstract

We describe a novel immunochromatographic method for qualitative and quantitative analyses of bacopaside I, a bioactive constituent in Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst in biological samples. The assay was performed on polyethersulfone membrane using a polyclonal antibody raised against bacopaside I. The finalised method could quantitatively determine bacopaside I in the range of 31.3-1000.0ng and the detection and quantification limits were 1.0 and 31.3ng, respectively. The percentage recoveries of bacopaside I in blood and urine were nearly 100% indicating the accuracy of the extraction. The method was then applied for the determination of this compound in rat serum, urine and feces after an oral dose of 15mg/kg body weight. About 4% of the ingested dose of bacopaside I was detected in rat feces but none was detected in serum and urine which accorded with results from liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The accuracy, selectivity, sensitivity of the method are appropriate for in vivo pharmacokinetic studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Unspecified 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences
#4,321
of 5,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,119
of 415,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences
#33
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,117 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.