You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
福島第一原発事故による放射線災害地域の食品に対する態度を規定する要因:4波パネル調査による検討
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.14966/jssp.0928 |
| Authors |
三浦 麻子, 楠見 孝, 小倉 加奈代 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 4 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 73% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 73% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Social Psychology
#104
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,434
of 381,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Social Psychology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them