↓ Skip to main content

Geographical Differences in First Acquisition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cystic Fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geographical Differences in First Acquisition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cystic Fibrosis
Published in
Annals of the American Thoracic Society, April 2013
DOI 10.1513/annalsats.201209-077oc
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarath C. Ranganathan, Billy Skoric, Kay A. Ramsay, Rosemary Carzino, Anne-Marie Gibson, Emily Hart, Jo Harrison, Scott C. Bell, Timothy J. Kidd

Abstract

Risk of infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis (CF) may be associated with environmental factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 15 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2013.
All research outputs
#20,191,579
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#2,780
of 2,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,824
of 200,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.