↓ Skip to main content

An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report: Optimal Lung Function Tests for Monitoring Cystic Fibrosis, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, and Recurrent Wheezing in Children Less Than 6 Years of…

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report: Optimal Lung Function Tests for Monitoring Cystic Fibrosis, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, and Recurrent Wheezing in Children Less Than 6 Years of Age
Published in
Annals of the American Thoracic Society, April 2013
DOI 10.1513/annalsats.201301-017st
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret Rosenfeld, Julian Allen, Bert H. G. M. Arets, Paul Aurora, Nicole Beydon, Claudia Calogero, Robert G. Castile, Stephanie D. Davis, Susanne Fuchs, Monika Gappa, Per M. Gustaffson, Graham L. Hall, Marcus H. Jones, Jane C. Kirkby, Richard Kraemer, Enrico Lombardi, Sooky Lum, Oscar H. Mayer, Peter Merkus, Kim G. Nielsen, Cara Oliver, Ellie Oostveen, Sarath Ranganathan, Clement L. Ren, Paul D. Robinson, Paul C. Seddon, Peter D. Sly, Marianna M. Sockrider, Samatha Sonnappa, Janet Stocks, Padmaja Subbarao, Robert S. Tepper, Daphna Vilozni, on behalf of the American Thoracic Society Assembly on Pediatrics Working Group on Infant and Preschool Lung Function Testing

Abstract

Although pulmonary function testing plays a key role in the diagnosis and management of chronic pulmonary conditions in children under 6 years of age, objective physiologic assessment is limited in the clinical care of infants and children less than 6 years old, due to the challenges of measuring lung function in this age range. Ongoing research in lung function testing in infants, toddlers, and preschoolers has resulted in techniques that show promise as safe, feasible, and potentially clinically useful tests. Official American Thoracic Society workshops were convened in 2009 and 2010 to review six lung function tests based on a comprehensive review of the literature (infant raised-volume rapid thoracic compression and plethysmography, preschool spirometry, specific airway resistance, forced oscillation, the interrupter technique, and multiple-breath washout). In these proceedings, the current state of the art for each of these tests is reviewed as it applies to the clinical management of infants and children under 6 years of age with cystic fibrosis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and recurrent wheeze, using a standardized format that allows easy comparison between the measures. Although insufficient evidence exists to recommend incorporation of these tests into the routine diagnostic evaluation and clinical monitoring of infants and young children with cystic fibrosis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or recurrent wheeze, they may be valuable tools with which to address specific concerns, such as ongoing symptoms or monitoring response to treatment, and as outcome measures in clinical research studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 155 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 14%
Other 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Other 46 29%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 59%
Engineering 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 38 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2013.
All research outputs
#20,191,579
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#2,780
of 2,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,824
of 200,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.