↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: Cognitive Performance in Autism and Asperger’s Syndrome: What are the Differences?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Brief Report: Cognitive Performance in Autism and Asperger’s Syndrome: What are the Differences?
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1828-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Taddei, Bastianina Contena

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorders include autistic and Asperger's Syndrome (AS), often studied in terms of executive functions (EF), with controversial results. Using Planning Attention Simultaneous Successive theory (PASS; Das et al. in Assessment of cognitive processes: the PASS theory of intelligence. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, 1994), this research compares the cognitive profiles obtained by the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS; Naglieri and Das in Cognitive assessment system. Riverside, Itasca, IL, 1997) of 15 subjects with typical development, 18 with autistic disorder and 20 with AS. Results highlight lower profiles for children with autistic and AS compared with typical development and even lower Planning and Attention processes for the group with autistic disorders than that with Asperger's. Subjects with Asperger's diagnosis do not differ from those with typical development as regards Simultaneous and Successive processes. Results are discussed in the light of current studies about EF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,919,456
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4,025
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,070
of 207,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#40
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.