↓ Skip to main content

Heidegger's formal indication: A question of method in Being and Time

Overview of attention for article published in Continental Philosophy Review, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Heidegger's formal indication: A question of method in Being and Time
Published in
Continental Philosophy Review, October 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1004250206794
Authors

Ryan Streeter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 39%
Professor 3 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 8 44%
Arts and Humanities 5 28%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Continental Philosophy Review
#136
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,716
of 28,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Continental Philosophy Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them