You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
National PReCePT Programme: a before-and-after evaluation of the implementation of a national quality improvement programme to increase the uptake of magnesium sulfate in preterm deliveries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324579 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah B Edwards, Maria Theresa Redaniel, Carlos Sillero-Rejon, Ruta Margelyte, Tim J Peters, Kate Tilling, William Hollingworth, Hugh McLeod, Pippa Craggs, Elizabeth Hill, Sabi Redwood, Jenny Donovan, Emma Treloar, Ellie Wetz, Natasha Swinscoe, Gary A Ford, John Macleod, Karen Luyt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 37 | 56% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 17% |
| Scientists | 7 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#315,441
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#11
of 2,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,643
of 478,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.