| Title |
Genome-wide association mapping and agronomic impact of cowpea root architecture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-016-2823-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James D. Burridge, Hannah M. Schneider, Bao-Lam Huynh, Philip A. Roberts, Alexander Bucksch, Jonathan P. Lynch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 21% |
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,508,088
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,173
of 4,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,440
of 422,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#18
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.