You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Multiple Sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1148/radiol.12120707 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Langkammer, Tian Liu, Michael Khalil, Christian Enzinger, Margit Jehna, Siegrid Fuchs, Franz Fazekas, Yi Wang, Stefan Ropele |
| Abstract |
To apply quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in the basal ganglia of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and relate the findings to R2* mapping with regard to the sensitivity for clinical and morphologic measures of disease severity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 188 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 29% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 22 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 10% |
| Engineering | 20 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Radiology
#8,541
of 10,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,832
of 290,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology
#66
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.