| Title |
Comet assay: A brief history
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Biology and Toxicology, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10565-008-9081-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. M. Piperakis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 6% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 62 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 23% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,613,499
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#33
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,367
of 82,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them