↓ Skip to main content

Deep ion sequencing of amplicon adapter ligated libraries: a novel tool in molecular diagnostics of formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissues

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Pathology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep ion sequencing of amplicon adapter ligated libraries: a novel tool in molecular diagnostics of formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissues
Published in
Journal of Clinical Pathology, April 2013
DOI 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201549
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerstin Becker, Claudia Vollbrecht, Ulrike Koitzsch, Katharina Koenig, Jana Fassunke, Sebastian Huss, Peter Nuernberg, Lukas C Heukamp, Reinhard Buettner, Margarete Odenthal, Janine Altmueller, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse

Abstract

Due to the advanced progress in personalised therapy concepts for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we applied the ion semiconductor sequencing (ISS) approach to molecular diagnosis of NSCLC, analysing a set of therapy relevant gene loci. DNA from macrodissected tumour samples of formalin fixed biopsies was used for PCR amplification of EGFR exons 18, 19, 21 and KRAS exon 1. A total of 128 PCR products were analysed by conventional termination sequencing as well as by ISS. Sensitivity of ISS was additionally determined using 100-10 000 copies of reference mutants. All somatic mutations detected by direct Sanger sequencing were also identified by ISS. No additional mutants were detected. Running samples with limited copies of mutated alleles revealed high sensitivity, detecting less than 10% (2500 copies) mutants in a human wild type background. In conclusion, multiplexed mutation analyses by ISS is an efficient technology that can easily be linked to existing PCR approaches in molecular pathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Other 3 17%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,234,486
of 25,081,419 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Pathology
#1,024
of 4,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,372
of 198,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Pathology
#12
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,419 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.