| Title |
The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-006-0578-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kent C. Berridge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 16% |
| France | 6 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 76% |
| Scientists | 9 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | <1% |
| Canada | 11 | <1% |
| Germany | 10 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 9 | <1% |
| France | 8 | <1% |
| Australia | 8 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 7 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2023 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 538 | 25% |
| Researcher | 334 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 296 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 244 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 131 | 6% |
| Other | 356 | 16% |
| Unknown | 270 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 599 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 394 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 374 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 195 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 43 | 2% |
| Other | 213 | 10% |
| Unknown | 351 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#389,173
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#112
of 5,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#557
of 89,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#3
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.