↓ Skip to main content

High-Dose Pyridoxine and Magnesium Administration in Children with Autistic Disorder: An Absence of Salutary Effects in a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
High-Dose Pyridoxine and Magnesium Administration in Children with Autistic Disorder: An Absence of Salutary Effects in a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1025861522935
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert L. Findling, Kathleen Maxwell, Lynette Scotese-Wojtila, Jie Huang, Toyoko Yamashita, Max Wiznitzer

Abstract

Several reports have described salutary effects such as decreased physical aggression and improved social responsiveness being associated with the administration of high doses of pyridoxine and magnesium (HDPM) in open-labeled and controlled studies of patients with autism. Despite this fact, this intervention remains controversial. A 10-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was undertaken to examine both the efficacy and safety of HDPM in autism. Twelve patients were enrolled, and 10 patients (mean age 6 years 3 months) were able to complete the study. HDPM at an average dose of 638.9 mg of pyridoxine and 216.3 mg of magnesium oxide was ineffective in ameliorating autistic behaviors as assessed by the Children's Psychiatric Rating Scale (CPRS), the Clinical Global Impression Scale, and the NIMH Global Obsessive Compulsive Scale. Furthermore, no clinically significant side effects were noted during HDPM administration. A trend for a transient change on the CPRS was found that was possibly due to a placebo response. This study raises doubts about the clinical effectiveness of HDPM in autistic disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,777,586
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,724
of 5,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,867
of 28,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them