↓ Skip to main content

Sulfonylureas and Risk of Falls and Fractures: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Sulfonylureas and Risk of Falls and Fractures: A Systematic Review
Published in
Drugs & Aging, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40266-013-0081-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate L. Lapane, Shibing Yang, Monique J. Brown, Rachel Jawahar, Caleb Pagliasotti, Swapnil Rajpathak

Abstract

Sulfonylureas have been linked to increased risk of hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia may lead to falls, and falls may lead to fracture. However, studies quantifying the association between sulfonylureas and fractures are sparse and yield inconsistent results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 103 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 14 13%
Other 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,270,698
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#956
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,293
of 195,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.