Title |
Rapid test for lung maturity, based on spectroscopy of gastric aspirate, predicted respiratory distress syndrome with high sensitivity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Paediatrica, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1111/apa.13683 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Henrik Verder, Christian Heiring, Howard Clark, David Sweet, Torben E. Jessen, Finn Ebbesen, Lars J. Björklund, Bengt Andreasson, Lars Bender, Aksel Bertelsen, Marianne Dahl, Christian Eschen, Jesper Fenger‐Grøn, Stine F. Hoffmann, Agnar Höskuldsson, Maria Bruusgaard‐Mouritsen, Fredrik Lundberg, Anthony D. Postle, Peter Schousboe, Peter Schmidt, Hristo Stanchev, Lars Sørensen |
Abstract |
Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in premature infants. By the time symptoms appear it may already be too late to prevent a severe course, with bronchopulmonary dysplasia or mortality. We aimed to develop a rapid test of lung maturity for targeting surfactant supplementation. Concentrations of the most surface-active lung phospholipid dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin in gastric aspirates from premature infants were measured by mass spectrometry and expressed as the lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio (L/S). The same aspirates were analysed with mid-infrared spectroscopy. Subsequently, L/S was measured in gastric aspirates and oropharyngeal secretions from another group of premature infants using spectroscopy and the results were compared with RDS development. The 10-minute analysis required 10 μL of aspirate. An L/S algorithm was developed based on 89 aspirates. Subsequently gastric aspirates were sampled in 136 infants of 24-31 weeks of gestation and 61 (45%) developed RDS. The cut-off value of L/S was 2.2, sensitivity was 92% and specificity was 73%. In 59 cases the oropharyngeal secretions had less valid L/S than gastric aspirate results. Our rapid test for lung maturity, based on spectroscopy of gastric aspirate, predicted RDS with high sensitivity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 16 | 31% |