Title |
Playing with Flint: Tracing a Child’s Imitation of Adult Work in a Lithic Assemblage
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10816-007-9050-4 |
Authors |
Anders Högberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
Argentina | 3 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 135 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 26% |
Researcher | 35 | 24% |
Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
Professor | 9 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 20% |
Unknown | 12 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 71 | 48% |
Social Sciences | 48 | 32% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 1% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2013.
All research outputs
#6,253,760
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#135
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,417
of 161,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them