| Title |
The impact of mHealth interventions on health systems: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-016-0387-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jill Fortuin, Faatiema Salie, Leila H. Abdullahi, Tania S. Douglas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 175 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 20% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 50 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 57 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#13,243,001
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,389
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,676
of 418,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#32
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.