↓ Skip to main content

Structural brain abnormalities in patients with vestibular migraine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Structural brain abnormalities in patients with vestibular migraine
Published in
Journal of Neurology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00415-016-8349-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberta Messina, Maria A. Rocca, Bruno Colombo, Roberto Teggi, Andrea Falini, Giancarlo Comi, Massimo Filippi

Abstract

New advances in understanding the pathophysiology of vestibular migraine (VM) have suggested a large overlap between migraine and vestibular pathways. We explored the regional distribution of gray (GM) and white matter (WM) abnormalities in VM patients in comparison to migraine patients with (MWA) and without aura (MWoA) and their correlations with patients' clinical manifestations. Using a 3.0 Tesla scanner, brain T2-weighted and 3D T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired from 19 VM, 19 MWA, 19 MWoA and 20 age-matched controls. GM and WM volumetric abnormalities were estimated using voxel-based morphometry (SPM12). Compared to controls, migraine patients had decreased GM volume of the left cerebellum and an increased GM volume of the left temporal lobe. VM patients had a selective GM volume increase of frontal and occipital regions compared to controls and the other two groups of migraineurs and no regions with decreased GM volume. Compared to MWoA and MWA, VM had increased GM volume of the left thalamus. Regional GM abnormalities did not correlate with disease duration and attack frequency. No WM volumetric differences were detected between migraine patients and controls. These results show that GM volume abnormalities of nociceptive and multisensory vestibular brain areas occur in VM patients. Overall, our findings suggest that an abnormal brain sensitization might lead to a dismodulation of multimodal sensory integration and processing cortical areas in VM patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Computer Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 22 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,262,888
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,509
of 4,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,516
of 415,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#27
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.