↓ Skip to main content

Reconsidering the Role of Manual Imitation in Language Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Topoi, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Reconsidering the Role of Manual Imitation in Language Evolution
Published in
Topoi, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11245-016-9440-x
Authors

Antonella Tramacere, Richard Moore

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 6 19%
Social Sciences 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Psychology 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,741,488
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Topoi
#484
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#351,599
of 417,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Topoi
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.