↓ Skip to main content

Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 2,889)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1335 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1642 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations
Published in
Nature Reviews Microbiology, January 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41579-022-00846-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah E. Davis, Lisa McCorkell, Julia Moore Vogel, Eric J. Topol

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26,321 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,642 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1642 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 211 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 7%
Student > Master 113 7%
Student > Bachelor 105 6%
Other 97 6%
Other 234 14%
Unknown 767 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 263 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 124 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 57 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 2%
Other 279 17%
Unknown 817 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16705. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#55
of 25,884,216 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#1
of 2,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4
of 480,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,884,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.