| Title |
Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction - joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-016-4471-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rania Farouk El Sayed, Celine D. Alt, Francesca Maccioni, Matthias Meissnitzer, Gabriele Masselli, Lucia Manganaro, Valeria Vinci, Dominik Weishaupt, On behalf of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Austria | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 24% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 54% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2016.
All research outputs
#15,120,836
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,290
of 5,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,244
of 388,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#23
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.