↓ Skip to main content

The Power of Group Discussion: Enhancing Reflexivity in Professionals’ Practice When Dealing with Family Diversity

Overview of attention for article published in Systemic Practice and Action Research, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 140)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
The Power of Group Discussion: Enhancing Reflexivity in Professionals’ Practice When Dealing with Family Diversity
Published in
Systemic Practice and Action Research, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11213-014-9332-1
Authors

Marina Everri, Laura Fruggeri, Elena Venturelli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 21%
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 21%
Computer Science 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2016.
All research outputs
#6,129,652
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#17
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,287
of 240,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them